Page History

DC field

Title

MODS field

Comments (from Leiden and when noted from Utrecht)

contributor

author

<name><namePart>*<role type="text">creator*

contributor

editor

<name><namePart>*<role type="text">editor*

contributor

promotor

<name><namePart>*<role type="text">promotor*

contributor

<name><namePart>

coverage

court

<subject><hierarchicalGeographic>

coverage

researchinstiture

<subject><hierarchicalGeographic>

coverage

spatial

<subject><geographic>

creator

faculty

<name type="text">corporate

creator

metisid

<name type="text">enumerated

Utrecht: is this the DAI? We use that as suffix for contributor.author

creator

<name><description>

date

accessioned

<originInfo><dateCaptured>

(means 'addition to repositorium' -> date in DSPACE

date

available

<originInfo><dateOther type="text">available

date

created

<originInfo><dateCreated>

date

issued

<originInfo><dateIssued>

date

metis

<originInfo><dateOther type="text">metis

description

abstract

<abstract>

description

sponsorship

<note>

description

<note>

format

extent

<physicalDescription><extent>

format

mimetype

<physicalDescription><internetMediaType>

identifier

annotationnr

<identifier type="text">annotationnr

identifier

metisid

<identifier type="text">metisid

identifier

uri

<location><uri>

language

<language>

publisher

place

<originInfo><place>

publisher

<originInfo>

<ac:structured-macro ac:name="unmigrated-wiki-markup" ac:schema-version="1" ac:macro-id="754a0503ee62caad-fd94dbff-4b0c4784-b4298ec0-70d903a18ab1fa58e73a022c"><ac:plain-text-body><![CDATA[

relation

references

[Title of a book][][Place of publication]:[] [publisher]; [ ][year of issue].

Utrecht: We don't use relation.references

]]></ac:plain-text-body></ac:structured-macro>

rights

<accessCondition>

source

booktitle

<relatedItem><titleinfo><title>

Utrecht: We use our own defined field relation.ispartofmonograph

source

bundletitle

<relatedItem><type>bundle</type><titleinfo><title>

Utrecht: We use our own defined field relation.ispartofseries

source

contribution

<relatedItem><type>contributing</type><titleinfo><title>

Utrecht: We don't use a field for this (yet)

source

epage

<relatedItem><part><extent><end>

Utrecht: We use our own defined field relation.ispartofendpage

source

issue

<relatedItem><type>issue</type><titleinfo><title>

Utrecht: We use our own defined field relation.ispartofissue

source

journaltitle

<relatedItem><type>host</type><titleinfo><title>

Utrecht: We use our own defined field relation.ispartofseries

source

pag

<relatedItem><part><extent><total>

Utrecht: We don't use a field for this (yet)

source

series

<relatedItem><type>series</type><titleinfo><title>

Utrecht: We use our own defined field relation.ispartofmonograph

source

spage

<relatedItem><part><extent><start>

Utrecht: We use our own defined field relation.ispartofstartpage

source

uri

<location><url>

Utrecht: We don't think this is part of MODS

source

volume

<relatedItem><type>bundle</type><identifier>

Utrecht: We use our own defined field relation.ispartofvolume

source

<relatedItem><note>

Utrecht: We use our own defined field description.note

subject

ddc

<classification>*<authority>ddc*

subject

lcc

<classification>*<authority>lcc*

subject

lcsh

<subject><authority>lcsh

subject

mesh

<subject><authority>mesh

subject

<subject><name>

title

alternative

<titleInfo><type>alternative<title>

title

<titleInfo><title>

type

class

KNAW
Utrecht: We don't think this is part of MODS

type

metis

Utrecht: We don't use a part field, but make a mapping to dc:type with import

type